The ‘tyranny of relevance’ is a convenient and popular target for academic historians. Mention the ‘r’ word with a raised eyebrow during a conference coffee break, or condemn instrumentalist research policy at a committee meeting and you are likely to receive murmurs of sympathy.
Tag Archive for ‘Science Communication (Wissenschaftskommunikation)’
There is no doubt that, since its inception in the United States, public history has been increasingly professionalized internationally as an academic teaching and research discipline. At German universities, however, its status is still fuzzy. Although …
From our “Wilde 13” section. “Thank you for your kind introduction,” “Many thanks for your stimulating comments,” “Thank you for those further references,” “Thank you, I shall happily… Read More ›
From our “Wilde 13” section. “Danke für die freundliche Einführung”, “Vielen Dank für die anregenden Kommentare”, “Ich danke ihnen für die weiterführenden Hinweise”, “Danke, ich werde das gerne aufnehmen”… Read More ›
Are you still listening to the promises that interconnectedness would abolish all hierarchies, that that mythical entity, “The Web,” would dissolve all boundaries, providing everything for everyone, a promised digital realm within immediate reach? All one had to do, so the claim went, was to be creative yet highly disciplined, and permanently online with everyone else, all of us using the new, smart programmes.